Skip to main content
Cyber News - All

Embracing Vendor Consolidation for Cyber Safety in Veterinary Practice

By September 18, 2023February 16th, 2024No Comments

As the significance of cybersecurity continues to grow, sectors once deemed low-priority targets for cybercriminals now face the pressing need for solid digital defenses. Veterinary practices, with their unique blend of patient care and data management, are no exception. Yet, these practices often find themselves caught in a challenging paradox. On the one hand, the urgency for secure digital operations is obvious; on the other, many within the industry remain either unaware or skeptical of the threats they might face.

This skepticism isn’t entirely unfounded. After all, why would cybercriminals target veterinary practices? The answer isn’t always straightforward. With the rise of interconnected systems and the value of data, even seemingly inconsequential targets can be stepping stones for larger cyber operations or can hold unexpected value. Yet, most veterinary practices function with a skeleton understanding of cybersecurity. Fragmented defenses, a lack of integration, and outdated systems sometimes become the unintended norm. The reasons are multifaceted: a natural focus on animal care, a belief in their perceived immunity to cyber threats, and a general unfamiliarity with the intricacies of digital defense.

However, even as we venture deeper into this topic, it’s crucial to approach it with balance. Vendor consolidation, the process of reducing and integrating the number of security vendors an entity works with, holds promise as a potential solution to these challenges. But like all solutions, it comes with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. This article aims to shed light on both sides, providing veterinary practices with a comprehensive view, enabling them to make informed decisions in their journey towards improved cybersecurity.

The Cybersecurity Landscape in Veterinary Practices

Given the industry’s skepticism and often limited cybersecurity measures, understanding the current landscape is crucial. Veterinary practices are far from immune; they sit at the intersection of medical data and client information, a combination that could be lucrative for cybercriminals. Outdated systems and fragmented defenses are not anomalies but norms that increase vulnerability.

The notion that veterinary practices are “low-value targets” misses the mark. In an era where data is currency, these practices can unwittingly become part of larger cyber schemes. While the focus remains on animal care, the data collected has broader implications, elevating the need for robust security measures.

The current state of cybersecurity in veterinary practices underscores a critical gap between the increasing digital threats and the industry’s preparedness. This gap serves as the backdrop against which solutions like vendor consolidation should be considered.

Vendor Consolidation: A Double-Edged Sword

Vendor consolidation, a strategy of reducing the number of vendors that manage different aspects of a business, in this case, cybersecurity, offers a pathway for veterinary practices to address their unique challenges. The essence of this approach is to simplify the otherwise complex architecture of security protocols by centralizing services under one or fewer vendors. This centralization holds particular importance for veterinary practices that handle a diverse set of data—ranging from patient records and inventory management to billing—each requiring distinct security measures.

In a veterinary practice that has embraced vendor consolidation, the day-to-day operations would notably differ in their cybersecurity aspects. For instance, instead of having fragmented security protocols managed by different vendors, the practice would have a unified system. Security updates and patches would be centralized, significantly reducing the risk of human error in maintaining multiple systems. This centralized approach would not only streamline the management of cybersecurity but also provide a comprehensive view into the health of the practice’s digital defenses through unified reporting and monitoring. The advantages of this streamlined approach are multifold and would include:

  • Streamlined Management: Managing one vendor is often easier than juggling several, freeing up time and resources.
  • Cost-Efficiency: Bulk services often come with discounted rates, and administrative overhead is reduced.
  • Improved Security: With fewer systems to maintain, the chances of missing an update or a patch decrease, potentially strengthening the security posture.
  • Enhanced Compliance: A unified system is easier to audit, which is beneficial for practices that need to adhere to data protection regulations.

However, even with these advantages, vendor consolidation also has its own downsides. Some of the disadvantages that veterinary practices can expect after implementing the system include:

  • Single Point of Failure: Centralizing services introduces the risk of a single point of failure that could compromise the entire system.
  • Lack of Customization: A single vendor may not offer the specialized services that a diverse practice might require.
  • Vendor Lock-In: Over-reliance on one vendor could make it difficult and costly to switch providers in the future.
  • Potential for Complacency: With fewer vendors to evaluate and manage, there could be less impetus to continuously assess and improve security measures.

Therefore, the decision to adopt vendor consolidation should be made carefully, accounting for the specific needs, vulnerabilities, and objectives of each veterinary practice. While the practice offers a streamlined approach to managing cybersecurity, it also carries inherent risks. Veterinary practices must weigh these advantages and disadvantages as they seek to strengthen their cybersecurity measures.


Simply put, vendor consolidation stands as a compelling approach for veterinary practices looking to navigate the complex landscape of cybersecurity. By streamlining services under fewer or a single vendor, practices can achieve an integrated security architecture that offers not only ease of management but also the potential for improved security protocols. This centralization enables a unified view into the cybersecurity health of the practice, allowing for more effective decision-making.

While the strategy is not without its challenges—such as the risk of a single point of failure and potential lack of customization—the benefits often outweigh the drawbacks. Cost efficiency, simplified management, and enhanced compliance are just some of the compelling advantages that make this approach worth considering. Moreover, in an era where cyber threats are escalating and diversifying, the simplification and centralization of security services can act as a robust first line of defense for veterinary practices.

Submit questions for our upcoming webinar aiming to demystify the complex world of veterinary technology!

Learn More